| |

Battle of Shiloh: Shattering MythsAmerica's Civil War | 9 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post
Buell, on the other hand, painted a picture of a dilapidated Army of the Tennessee on the brink of defeat. Only his arrival with fresh columns of Army of the Ohio troops won the day. The lead brigade, commanded by Colonel Jacob Ammen, deployed on the ridge south of the landing and met the Confederate advance. In Buell’s mind, Grant’s troops could not have held without his army. Subscribe Today
In reality, the Confederates probably had little hope of breaking Grant’s last line. Situated on a tall ridge overlooking streams known as the Dill and Tilghman branches, Grant’s forces, battered though they were, still had enough fight in them to hold their extremely strong position, especially since they had over 50 pieces of artillery in line. Likewise, the troops were massed in compact positions. Good interior lines of defense also helped, and two Federal gunboats fired on the Confederates from the river. Grant poured heavy fire into the Confederates from the front, flank and rear.
The Confederates never actually assaulted the Federal line, further damaging Buell’s assertion. Only elements of four disorganized and exhausted Confederate brigades crossed the backwater in the Dill Branch ravine as gunboat shells flew through the air. Only two of those brigades undertook an assault, one without ammunition. The Confederates topped the rise and faced a withering fire. They were convinced. Orders from Beauregard to withdraw did not have to be repeated.
In fact, only 12 companies of Buell’s army crossed in time to deploy and become engaged. Grant had the situation well under control and could have fended off much larger numbers than he actually encountered. While Buell’s arrival did provide a morale boost and allowed Grant to take the offensive the next morning, Grant had the battle situation under control by the time Buell arrived.
The South would have won had Beauregard not called off the assaults.
For many years after the battle, former Confederates castigated General Beauregard for his actions at Shiloh. Their main complaint was that the army commander, having taken charge of the Confederate forces after Johnston’s death, called off the final Confederate assaults on the evening of April 6. Many argued that the Confederates had victory within their grasp and needed only one last effort to destroy Grant’s army. Beauregard, however, called off his Southern boys and thus threw away a victory. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
The controversy had its beginnings while the war still raged. Corps commanders Maj. Gens. William J. Hardee and Braxton Bragg later pounced on Beauregard for calling off the attacks, even though their immediate post-battle correspondence said nothing de-rogatory about their commander. After the war ended, Southerners began to argue that being outnumbered and outproduced industrially were reasons for their defeat, and also blamed the battle deaths of leaders like Johnston and Stonewall Jackson. Another key element in their argument, however, was poor leadership on the part of certain generals such as James Longstreet at Gettysburg (of course it did not help that Longstreet turned his back on the solidly Democratic South and went Republican after the war) and Beauregard at Shiloh. The sum of all those parts became known as the Lost Cause.
Hardee, Bragg and thousands of other former Confederates argued after the war that Beauregard threw away the victory. Beauregard does bear some blame, but not for making the wrong decision to end the attacks. He made the right decision, but for all the wrong reasons. The general made his decision far behind his front lines, an area completely awash with stragglers and wounded. No wonder Beauregard argued that his army was so disorganized that he needed to call a halt.
Similarly, Beauregard acted on faulty intelligence. He received word that Buell’s reinforcements were not arriving at Pittsburg Landing. One of Buell’s divisions was in Alabama, but unfortunately for Beauregard, five were actually en route to Pittsburg Landing. Based on such spotty intelligence, Beauregard thought he could finish Grant the next morning. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Tags: 19th Century, America's Civil War, American Civil War, Historical Conflicts
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
9 Comments to “Battle of Shiloh: Shattering Myths”
This was no help at all.
By miller on Sep 25, 2008 at 12:30 pm
It seems like all articles written about Shiloh are basiclly the same,a chaotic battle,with confusing reports.The O.R. reports are even conflicting.The one thing that we can all agree on about Shiloh is the chaotic, confusion of raw green troops on both sides and conflicting battle reports from officers and newspaper reporters.There will never be a truely accurate article written about Shiloh.Thats what makes it such a unique battle in the fight for the west
By frank brazil on Oct 13, 2008 at 5:50 pm
this was really helpfull to me and my report
By nicole on Nov 24, 2008 at 9:12 pm
What is with all the colored words? I mean I really like to read up on the Battle of Shiloh Hill, But come on! Is it really nessesary to color some of the words? It’s kinda’ disorienting if you ask me. Oh well. Anyhow, I like to read up on the Battle of Shiloh Hill because it personifies the words courage, valor, and divotion. The men that died in that great battle must have been very brave to watch their comrads fall right and left. They also must have been very divoted men to fight with such bravery in the face of danger. The men that died on both sides of the civil war are my heros, and I look up to them for courage and bravery! ^-^
By holt on Dec 10, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Well the answer to the Sunken Rd. myth seems obvious, “Sunken Road” “Duncan Road.” Okay that’s a tongue in cheek comment but other historical myths have been perpetuated on just such mispronounced or misheard words or names.
By George Willis on Jan 23, 2009 at 11:47 am
i agree will miller
By Savannah on Apr 23, 2009 at 4:09 pm
agreed.
By Michaela on May 3, 2009 at 11:00 pm
I am in 8th grade and this was a tuff report but your site was no help to me……bummer ^,.,^
By Tylar on May 14, 2009 at 2:36 pm
i mean high liighted
By Brennon on May 18, 2009 at 11:44 am