HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Battle of Shiloh: Shattering Myths

America's Civil War  | 9 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

One of the most famous of all surprises in military history is Pearl Harbor, where Japanese planes attacked the U.S. Pacific Fleet based in Hawaii. The attack on December 7, 1941, was indeed a surprise, with bombs dropping out of a clear blue sky. Shiloh is another well-known example of a supposed surprise attack. On the morning of April 6, 1862, the Confederate Army of the Mississippi under Johnston launched an attack on Maj. Gen. Grant’s Army of the Tennessee near Pittsburg Landing. One author has even gone so far as to call it the Pearl Harbor of the Civil War. In actuality, Shiloh was not all that much of a surprise.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to America's Civil War magazine

The assertion of surprise came initially from contemporary newspaper columns that described Union soldiers being bayoneted in their tents as they slept. The most famous account came from Whitelaw Reid, a newspaper correspondent for the Cincinnati Gazette. But Reid was nowhere near Shiloh when the Confederates attacked, and he actually penned his nearly 15,000-word opus from miles away.

The idea that Reid perpetuated and that is still commonly believed today is that the Federals had no idea that the enemy was so near. Nothing could be further from the truth. For days before April 6, minor skirmishing took place. Both sides routinely took prisoners in the days leading up to the battle. The rank and file in the Union army knew Confederates were out there — they just did not know in what strength.

The problem lay with the Federal commanders. Ordered not to bring on an engagement and convinced they would have to march to Corinth, Miss., to fight the bulk of the Confederate army, the Union leadership did not properly utilize the intelligence gained from the common soldiers on the front lines. Grant was not about to go looking for a fight in early April, certainly not before reinforcements arrived from Nashville in the form of the Army of the Ohio, and certainly not without orders from his superior, Maj. Gen. Henry W. Halleck.

Thus Grant ordered his frontline division commanders Sherman and Prentiss not to spark a fight, and they made sure their soldiers understood that directive. They sent orders reinforcing Grant’s concern down the line and refused to act on intelligence coming up through the ranks.

As a result, not wanting to prematurely begin a battle, Federal skirmishers and pickets continually withdrew as the Confederates probed forward. Perhaps Sherman said it best when he noted in his report, On Saturday the enemy’s cavalry was again very bold, coming well down to our front, yet I did not believe that he designed anything but a strong demonstration.

The lower echelon leadership was not all that convinced the fight would take place at Corinth, however. For days, brigade and regimental commanders had witnessed Confederates near their camps. Several patrols even went forward, but no major Confederate units were encountered.

Finally, on the night of April 5, one Union brigade commander took matters into his own hands. Sending out a patrol without authorization, Colonel Everett Peabody located the Confederate army at dawn on April 6. His tiny reconnaissance found the advance skirmishers of the Southern force less than a mile from the Union front. The Confederates promptly attacked, and the Battle of Shiloh began.

Because of Peabody’s patrol, however, the Confederate advance was unmasked earlier than intended and farther out from the Union camps than projected. The resulting delay in the Confederate assault on the Union camps allowed the Army of the Tennessee to mobilize. Because of the warning, every single Union unit on the field met the Confederate assault coming from Corinth south, or in advance of, their camps. Peabody’s patrol warned the army and thus prevented total tactical surprise at Shiloh.

Benjamin Prentiss was the hero of Shiloh.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Tags: , , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 9 Comments to “Battle of Shiloh: Shattering Myths”

  2. This was no help at all.

    By miller on Sep 25, 2008 at 12:30 pm

  3. It seems like all articles written about Shiloh are basiclly the same,a chaotic battle,with confusing reports.The O.R. reports are even conflicting.The one thing that we can all agree on about Shiloh is the chaotic, confusion of raw green troops on both sides and conflicting battle reports from officers and newspaper reporters.There will never be a truely accurate article written about Shiloh.Thats what makes it such a unique battle in the fight for the west

    By frank brazil on Oct 13, 2008 at 5:50 pm

  4. this was really helpfull to me and my report

    By nicole on Nov 24, 2008 at 9:12 pm

  5. What is with all the colored words? I mean I really like to read up on the Battle of Shiloh Hill, But come on! Is it really nessesary to color some of the words? It’s kinda’ disorienting if you ask me. Oh well. Anyhow, I like to read up on the Battle of Shiloh Hill because it personifies the words courage, valor, and divotion. The men that died in that great battle must have been very brave to watch their comrads fall right and left. They also must have been very divoted men to fight with such bravery in the face of danger. The men that died on both sides of the civil war are my heros, and I look up to them for courage and bravery! ^-^

    By holt on Dec 10, 2008 at 5:06 pm

  6. Well the answer to the Sunken Rd. myth seems obvious, “Sunken Road” “Duncan Road.” Okay that’s a tongue in cheek comment but other historical myths have been perpetuated on just such mispronounced or misheard words or names.

    By George Willis on Jan 23, 2009 at 11:47 am

  7. i agree will miller

    By Savannah on Apr 23, 2009 at 4:09 pm

  8. agreed.

    By Michaela on May 3, 2009 at 11:00 pm

  9. I am in 8th grade and this was a tuff report but your site was no help to me……bummer ^,.,^

    By Tylar on May 14, 2009 at 2:36 pm

  10. i mean high liighted

    By Brennon on May 18, 2009 at 11:44 am

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help