<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle Of Franklin: Civil War Sites - Carnton, Carter House, Lotz House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-franklin.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-franklin.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyguy</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-franklin.htm#comment-811985</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683031#comment-811985</guid>
		<description>It never happens MarkJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never happens MarkJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkJ</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-franklin.htm#comment-811974</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683031#comment-811974</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always a pleasure to read such a well written and referenced rebuttal.  I&#039;m surprised the author has not retracted his statement or at least modified the article to include the opposing point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s always a pleasure to read such a well written and referenced rebuttal.  I&#039;m surprised the author has not retracted his statement or at least modified the article to include the opposing point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyguy</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-franklin.htm#comment-367926</link>
		<dc:creator>kyguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13683031#comment-367926</guid>
		<description>To state that Gen Hood was &quot;frustrated&quot; and then ordered the assault at Franklin implies that his decision to attack was influenced by emotion rather than reason. Although the early morning breakfast at Spring Hill was described as contentious, there is no evidence whatsoever that Hood was in any way other than composed and contemplative during the march to Franklin and when pondering whether to attack Schofield&#039;s army at Franklin, or allow them to escape to the more fortified Nashville.

Sgt. Sumner Cunningham, standing near to Hood on Winstead Hill immediately before the attack wrote:

&quot;While making ready for the charge, General Hood rode up to our lines, having left his escort and staff in the rear. He remained at the front in plain view of the enemy for, perhaps, half an hour making a most careful survey of their lines.&quot; Cunningham continued &quot;...but I was absorbed in the one man whose mind was deciding the fate of thousands. With an arm and a leg in the grave, and with the consciousness that he had not until within a couple of days won the confidence which his army had in his predecessor, he had now a very trying ordeal to pass through. It was all-important to act, if at all, at once. He rode to Stephen D. Lee, the nearest of his subordinate generals, and, shaking hands with him cordially, announced his decision to make an immediate charge.&quot;

A member of A.P. Stewart’s staff, B.L. Ridley, wrote in his 1906 publication, Battles and Sketches of the Army of Tennessee:

&quot;It has been charged that he (Hood) gave the order to attack at Franklin because of chagrin at his failure at Spring Hill. This supposition does Hood great injustice. A Federal courier had been captured bearing dispatches between Thomas and Schofield of the Federal army. The tenor of the dispatches led Hood to believe that Franklin was not in a defensible position, and that therefore, as he expressed it, he thought his ‘time to fight had come’.&quot;

Col. Virgil S. Murphey of the 17th Alabama Infantry recorded in his diary:

&quot;Had Hood succeeded, Nashville would have opened her gates to the head of his victorious legions and the throat of Tennessee released from the grasp of remorseless despotism. It was worth the hazard. Its failure does not diminish the value of the prize.&quot;
 
&quot;Cato&quot; (anonymous member of the 125th O.V.I.) from an account of the Battle of Franklin, as published in the Cleveland Herald, December 8, 1864:

&quot;Hood saw his opportunity, and true to his combative proclivities availed himself thereof.  From a high hill he could easily see our position, and saw our forces gradually withdrawing to the opposite bank of the Little Harpeth. Military men will not condemn Hood&#039;s generalship in launching heavy assaulting columns, as he did upon our line.&quot;

Gen John Schofield wrote after the war:

&quot;Hood&#039;s assault at Franklin has been severely criticized. Even so able a general as J.E.Johnston has characterized it as ‘useless butchery&#039;. These criticisms are based on a misapprehension of the facts, and are essentially erroneous. Hood must have been aware of our relative weakness of numbers at Franklin, and of the probable, if not certain, concentration of large reinforcements at Nashville. He could not hope to have at any future time anything like so great an advantage in that respect. The army at Franklin and the troops at Nashville were within one night&#039;s march of each other; Hood must therefore attack on November 30 or lose the advantage of greatly superior numbers. It was impossible, after the pursuit from Spring Hill, in a short day to turn our position or make any other attack but a direct one in front. Besides our position with the river on our rear, gave him the chance of vastly greater results, if his assault were successful, than could be hoped for by any attack he could make after we had crossed the Harpeth. Still more, there was no unusual obstacle to a successful assault at Franklin. The defenses were of the slightest character, and it was not possible to make them formidable during the short time our troops were in position, after the previous exhausting operations of both day and night, which had rendered some rest on the 30th absolutely necessary.&quot; 

&quot;The Confederate cause had reached a condition closely verging on desperation, and Hood&#039;s commander-in-chief had called upon him to undertake operations which he thought appropriate to such an emergency. Franklin was the last opportunity he could expect to have to reap the results hoped for in his aggressive movement. He must strike there, as best he could, or give up his cause as lost.&quot;

Hood wrote in his Official Report: &quot;

I learned from dispatches captured at Spring Hill, from Thomas to Schofield, that the latter was instructed to hold that place till the position at Franklin could be made secure, indicating the intention of Thomas to hold Franklin and his strong works at Murfreesboro. Thus I knew that it was all important to attack Schofield before he could make himself strong, and if he should escape at Franklin he would gain his works about Nashville. The nature of the position was such as to render it inexpedient to attempt any further flank movement, and I therefore determined to attack him in front, and without delay.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To state that Gen Hood was &#034;frustrated&#034; and then ordered the assault at Franklin implies that his decision to attack was influenced by emotion rather than reason. Although the early morning breakfast at Spring Hill was described as contentious, there is no evidence whatsoever that Hood was in any way other than composed and contemplative during the march to Franklin and when pondering whether to attack Schofield&#039;s army at Franklin, or allow them to escape to the more fortified Nashville.</p>
<p>Sgt. Sumner Cunningham, standing near to Hood on Winstead Hill immediately before the attack wrote:</p>
<p>&#034;While making ready for the charge, General Hood rode up to our lines, having left his escort and staff in the rear. He remained at the front in plain view of the enemy for, perhaps, half an hour making a most careful survey of their lines.&#034; Cunningham continued &#034;&#8230;but I was absorbed in the one man whose mind was deciding the fate of thousands. With an arm and a leg in the grave, and with the consciousness that he had not until within a couple of days won the confidence which his army had in his predecessor, he had now a very trying ordeal to pass through. It was all-important to act, if at all, at once. He rode to Stephen D. Lee, the nearest of his subordinate generals, and, shaking hands with him cordially, announced his decision to make an immediate charge.&#034;</p>
<p>A member of A.P. Stewart’s staff, B.L. Ridley, wrote in his 1906 publication, Battles and Sketches of the Army of Tennessee:</p>
<p>&#034;It has been charged that he (Hood) gave the order to attack at Franklin because of chagrin at his failure at Spring Hill. This supposition does Hood great injustice. A Federal courier had been captured bearing dispatches between Thomas and Schofield of the Federal army. The tenor of the dispatches led Hood to believe that Franklin was not in a defensible position, and that therefore, as he expressed it, he thought his ‘time to fight had come’.&#034;</p>
<p>Col. Virgil S. Murphey of the 17th Alabama Infantry recorded in his diary:</p>
<p>&#034;Had Hood succeeded, Nashville would have opened her gates to the head of his victorious legions and the throat of Tennessee released from the grasp of remorseless despotism. It was worth the hazard. Its failure does not diminish the value of the prize.&#034;</p>
<p>&#034;Cato&#034; (anonymous member of the 125th O.V.I.) from an account of the Battle of Franklin, as published in the Cleveland Herald, December 8, 1864:</p>
<p>&#034;Hood saw his opportunity, and true to his combative proclivities availed himself thereof.  From a high hill he could easily see our position, and saw our forces gradually withdrawing to the opposite bank of the Little Harpeth. Military men will not condemn Hood&#039;s generalship in launching heavy assaulting columns, as he did upon our line.&#034;</p>
<p>Gen John Schofield wrote after the war:</p>
<p>&#034;Hood&#039;s assault at Franklin has been severely criticized. Even so able a general as J.E.Johnston has characterized it as ‘useless butchery&#039;. These criticisms are based on a misapprehension of the facts, and are essentially erroneous. Hood must have been aware of our relative weakness of numbers at Franklin, and of the probable, if not certain, concentration of large reinforcements at Nashville. He could not hope to have at any future time anything like so great an advantage in that respect. The army at Franklin and the troops at Nashville were within one night&#039;s march of each other; Hood must therefore attack on November 30 or lose the advantage of greatly superior numbers. It was impossible, after the pursuit from Spring Hill, in a short day to turn our position or make any other attack but a direct one in front. Besides our position with the river on our rear, gave him the chance of vastly greater results, if his assault were successful, than could be hoped for by any attack he could make after we had crossed the Harpeth. Still more, there was no unusual obstacle to a successful assault at Franklin. The defenses were of the slightest character, and it was not possible to make them formidable during the short time our troops were in position, after the previous exhausting operations of both day and night, which had rendered some rest on the 30th absolutely necessary.&#034; </p>
<p>&#034;The Confederate cause had reached a condition closely verging on desperation, and Hood&#039;s commander-in-chief had called upon him to undertake operations which he thought appropriate to such an emergency. Franklin was the last opportunity he could expect to have to reap the results hoped for in his aggressive movement. He must strike there, as best he could, or give up his cause as lost.&#034;</p>
<p>Hood wrote in his Official Report: &#034;</p>
<p>I learned from dispatches captured at Spring Hill, from Thomas to Schofield, that the latter was instructed to hold that place till the position at Franklin could be made secure, indicating the intention of Thomas to hold Franklin and his strong works at Murfreesboro. Thus I knew that it was all important to attack Schofield before he could make himself strong, and if he should escape at Franklin he would gain his works about Nashville. The nature of the position was such as to render it inexpedient to attempt any further flank movement, and I therefore determined to attack him in front, and without delay.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
