| |

Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act| American History | 22 comments | Print This Post | Email This Post
John Ross, on the other hand, would not yield. As head of the National Party that opposed removal he was shrewd enough to recognize immediately that the President would attempt to play one party off against the other. ‘The object of the President is unfolded & made too plain to be misunderstood,’ he told the Nation. ‘It is to create divisions among ourselves, break down our government, our press & our treasury, that our cries may not be heard abroad; that we may be deprived of the means of sending delegations to Washington City to make known our grievances before Congress . . . and break down the government which you [Cherokees] have, by your own free will & choice, established for the security of your freedom & common welfare.’ Subscribe Today
Under the circumstance, Ross decided to go to Washington and request a meeting with the President in order to try again to arrange some accommodation that would prevent the mass relocation of his people to what was now the new Indian Territory, which Congress had created in 1834 and which eventually became the state of Oklahoma. He was tormented by the knowledge that his people would be condemned to a ‘prairie badly watered and only skirted on the margin of water courses and poor ridges with copes of wood.’ Worse, districts would be laid out for some ‘fifteen or twenty different tribes, and all speaking different languages, and cherishing a variety of habits and customs, a portion civilized, another half civilized and others uncivilized, and these congregated tribes of Indians to be regulated under the General Government, by no doubt white rulers.’ The very thought of it sent shivers through Ross’s entire body.
Since he had fought with Jackson at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend during the Creek War he reckoned that his service during that battle would provide him with a degree of leverage in speaking with the President. And, as Principal Chief, he could speak with the duly constituted authority of the Cherokee Nation as established under the Cherokee Constitution of 1827. He had another reason for requesting the interview. He had heard a rumor that Jackson had commissioned the Reverend John F. Schermerhorn, an ambitious cleric who had assisted in the removal of the Seminoles from Florida, to negotiate with Ridge and his associates and see if a deal could be worked out that would result in a treaty. Definitely alarmed, Ross asked to speak with the President at which time he said he would submit his own proposal for a treaty.
Jackson never liked Ross. He called him ‘a great villain.’ Unlike Ridge and Boudinot, said Jackson, the Principal Chief headed a mixed-blood elite, and was intent on centralizing power in his own hands and diverting the annuities to those who would advance his authority and their economic self-interests. Real Indians were full-blooded Indians, not half-breeds, he declared. They were hunters, they were true warriors who, like Ridge and Boudinot, understood the President’s concern for his red children and wished to prevent the calamity of certain annihilation that would ensue if they did not heed his pleas to move west. As for Ross’s authority under the Cherokee Constitution, Jackson denied that it existed. He said that this so-called Constitution provided for an election in 1832 and it had not been held. Instead the Principal Chief had simply filled the National Council with his henchmen — another indication, claimed Jackson, of an elitist clique who ruled the Nation and disregarded the interests of the majority of the people.
Despite his feelings about the chief, Jackson decided to grant Ross’s request for a meeting. Above all else he wanted Cherokee removal and if that meant seeing this ‘great villain’ and hearing about his proposal for relocating the tribe then he would do it. As a consummate politician, Jackson understood the value of playing one party off against another, so when he granted the interview he directed that Schermerhorn suspend his negotiations with the Treaty Party and wait for the outcome of his interview with the Principal Chief. Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Tags: 19th Century, American History, American Indian Wars, Historical Conflicts, Historical Figures, Politics
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
22 Comments to “Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act”
i love history!!!!!!!!!!
By Austin on Nov 19, 2008 at 12:49 pm
i love history bcuz its very interestin
By samantha on Jan 8, 2009 at 3:00 pm
i love history cuz it is so amazing ;]
By samantha on Jan 8, 2009 at 3:01 pm
I LOVE EDWARD EVERETTTTT!
By daddys little gurll(: on Jan 15, 2009 at 8:29 pm
hate history!!!!!!!!!!
but for me………….this artical was very helpful.(:
To all you people who think there SO cool, to cool for school kinda kids. if ya need help in history go to historynet.com!!!!
its VERY helpful. after this ill probably go back to being cool!!!
haha but it helped and was VERY inspiring. Thankyou muchly(:
this website helped(:
-Peacce out
ps. if you are in need of help, REMEMBER, God is always there for you. he will answer ure prayers. just need to be forgiven.
<3 luv you kids(:
By daddys little gurll(: on Jan 15, 2009 at 10:40 pm
History revisionists have tried to make Andrew Jackson the scapegoat for the removal of the Cherokees. He did not come up with the idea on his own. The congress of the United States did after all pass this treaty. Jackson was out of office when the treaty was enforced.
According to the article, Jackson urged Van Buren to enforce the treaty. The article stated that when the treaty was enforced, the Cherokee were forcibly removed. Looters came in and took what was left.
That speaks volumes about the thugs the United States hires to do its dirty work. Case in point, the Cuban refugee boy that lesbian attorney general that worked for Clinton sent back to Cuba with a machine gun pointed at him.
I am sure that is not the way that cousin Andy, I am 5th cousin related through his father’s sister Tabatha Jackson, wanted the situation to turn out.
There were clashes amongst the settlers and the Cherokee. Jackson did not want them to be wiped out. The Whites were flowing in. The Cherokees were outnumbered. Look what those thugs did to the Cherokee. Jackson wanted to avoid that. He offered money and support and new land. Ross, who was not a full blooded Cherokee and lived like a white man with slaves, convinced the tribe to hold out even though the situation was untendable.
I saw a movie one time, I belive it was Charlie Sheen that was supposed to go undercover and bust a lot of outlaw bikers. During one scene in the movie, he was locked up in jail with an Indian fellow. They were talking about what a lone Indian was supposed to do when surrounded by 100 whites with guns. The Indian said
” give the f up”.
2000 Cherokee listened to Jackson and left for Oklahoma right away.
I think the Indian in the movie had the right idea.
By bbjohnson on Jan 18, 2009 at 9:37 pm
This place is such a good site…i really enjoy history
By me on Feb 19, 2009 at 1:04 am
BLEH!! HISTORY!
By jhdfjskhfame on Feb 23, 2009 at 9:42 pm
woa. . . . . . luved it!!!
By michella on Mar 5, 2009 at 1:17 pm
I HATE PRESIDENT JACKSON!!!
By Nick on Mar 14, 2009 at 12:27 pm
i love andrew jackson i have been too is house it is magnificent!!!!!!!!!!!
By patrick on Mar 16, 2009 at 9:16 am
i love andrew jackson<3
By frank on Mar 24, 2009 at 1:13 pm
Great president, but a JERK!!!!!!
By shamishka on Apr 14, 2009 at 8:39 pm
WOW
By sbfsdbfbsdf on Apr 29, 2009 at 12:11 pm
last year i got a D in history and this site helped me out!now i have a 90!!!!!!!!!!andrew jackson??????I HAV NO CLUE
By litterbox on May 5, 2009 at 10:42 am
i had a C in history and the teacher didnt help me at all so thos helped me a hole lot!!
By yolanda on May 5, 2009 at 10:43 am
This helps. but i hate history.. but i got really good notes on this. woo. haha.
By Ann. :) on May 20, 2009 at 12:37 pm
i think this is just wrong
By sharon d on May 28, 2009 at 9:11 am
i have never liked history its just not my thing….but this page was really helpful.
and who IS Andrew Jackson??
By cheyenne sanderson(loves ira thompson) on May 28, 2009 at 1:06 pm
boring but informative helped me out on mii project hooray
By tamzgurl33 on Oct 21, 2009 at 2:28 pm
cool webi site
By tamzgurl33 on Oct 21, 2009 at 2:29 pm