HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act

American History  | Single Page  | 26 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

With the annoying problem of the two missionaries out of the way, both Georgia and Jackson continued to lean on the Cherokees to get them to remove. 'Some of the most vicious and base characters that the adjoining states can produce' squatted on their land and stole 'horses and other property' and formed a link with as many 'bad citizens' of the Cherokee Nation 'as they can associate into their club.' Missionaries decried what was happening to the Cherokees. If only 'whites would not molest them,' wrote Dr. Elizur Butler in The Missionary Herald. They have made remarkable progress in the last dozen years and if left alone they can and will complete the process toward a 'civilized life.'

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to American History magazine

But allowing eastern Indians full control of their eastern lands was virtually impossible in the 1830s. There was not army enough or will enough by the American people to bring it about. As Jackson constantly warned, squatters would continue to invade and occupy the land they wanted; then, if they were attacked, they would turn to the state government for protection that usually ended in violence. All this under the guise of bringing 'civilization' to the wilderness.

Even so, the Cherokees had a strong leader who had not yet given up the fight. They were led by the wily, tough, and determined John Ross, a blue-eyed, brown-haired mixed-blood who was only one-eighth Cherokee. Nonetheless he was the Principal Chief, and a most powerful force within the Nation. He was rich, lived in a fine house attended by black slaves, and had influence over the annuities the United States paid to the tribal government for former land cessions. His appearance and life-style were distinctly white; in all other respects he was Indian.

From the beginning of Jackson's administration Ross urged his people to stand their ground and remain united. 'Friends,' he told his people, 'I have great hopes in your firmness and that you will hold fast to the place where you were raised. Friends if you all unite together and be of one mind there is no danger.' And the Cherokees cheered his determination. They approved wholeheartedly of his leadership and they took comfort in what he said. So, with the Nation solidly behind him, Ross resolutely resisted any thought of leading his people from their ancient land into a god-forsaken wilderness.

Still the Cherokees held out, even though even they had begun to feel the unrelenting pressure. A so-called Treaty Party emerged within the Nation, made up of chiefs and headmen who understood Jackson's inflexible will and had decided to bow to his wishes and try to get the best treaty possible. They were led by very capable, hard-headed, and pragmatic men, including the Speaker of the Cherokee National Council, Major Ridge; his son, the educated and politically ambitious John Ridge; and the editor of the Cherokee Phoenix, Elias Boudinot.

John Ridge took a leading role in the emergence of the Treaty Party, for when the Worcester decision was first handed down he instantly recognized that Chief Justice Marshall had rendered an opinion that abandoned the Cherokees to their inevitable fate. So he went to Jackson and asked him point-blank whether the power of the United States would be exerted to force Georgia into respecting Indian rights and property. The President assured him that the government would do nothing. He then advised Ridge 'most earnestly' to go home and urge his people to remove. Dejected, the chief left the President 'with the melancholy conviction that he had been told the truth. From that moment he was convinced that the only alternative to save his people from moral and physical death, was to make the best terms they could with the government and remove out of the limits of the states. This conviction he did not fail to make known to his friends, and hence rose the 'Treaty Party.' '

The members of this Treaty Party certainly risked their lives in pressing for removal, and indeed all of them were subsequently marked for assassination. Not too many years later, Elias Boudinot and John Ridge were slain with knives and tomahawks in the midst of their families, while Major Ridge was ambushed and shot to death.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Tags: , , , , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 26 Comments to “Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act”

  2. i love history!!!!!!!!!!

    By Austin on Nov 19, 2008 at 12:49 pm

  3. i love history bcuz its very interestin

    By samantha on Jan 8, 2009 at 3:00 pm

  4. i love history cuz it is so amazing ;]

    By samantha on Jan 8, 2009 at 3:01 pm

  5. I LOVE EDWARD EVERETTTTT!

    By daddys little gurll(: on Jan 15, 2009 at 8:29 pm

  6. hate history!!!!!!!!!!
    but for me………….this artical was very helpful.(:
    To all you people who think there SO cool, to cool for school kinda kids. if ya need help in history go to historynet.com!!!!
    its VERY helpful. after this ill probably go back to being cool!!!
    haha but it helped and was VERY inspiring. Thankyou muchly(:
    this website helped(:
    -Peacce out

    ps. if you are in need of help, REMEMBER, God is always there for you. he will answer ure prayers. just need to be forgiven.
    <3 luv you kids(:

    By daddys little gurll(: on Jan 15, 2009 at 10:40 pm

  7. History revisionists have tried to make Andrew Jackson the scapegoat for the removal of the Cherokees. He did not come up with the idea on his own. The congress of the United States did after all pass this treaty. Jackson was out of office when the treaty was enforced.
    According to the article, Jackson urged Van Buren to enforce the treaty. The article stated that when the treaty was enforced, the Cherokee were forcibly removed. Looters came in and took what was left.
    That speaks volumes about the thugs the United States hires to do its dirty work. Case in point, the Cuban refugee boy that lesbian attorney general that worked for Clinton sent back to Cuba with a machine gun pointed at him.
    I am sure that is not the way that cousin Andy, I am 5th cousin related through his father's sister Tabatha Jackson, wanted the situation to turn out.
    There were clashes amongst the settlers and the Cherokee. Jackson did not want them to be wiped out. The Whites were flowing in. The Cherokees were outnumbered. Look what those thugs did to the Cherokee. Jackson wanted to avoid that. He offered money and support and new land. Ross, who was not a full blooded Cherokee and lived like a white man with slaves, convinced the tribe to hold out even though the situation was untendable.
    I saw a movie one time, I belive it was Charlie Sheen that was supposed to go undercover and bust a lot of outlaw bikers. During one scene in the movie, he was locked up in jail with an Indian fellow. They were talking about what a lone Indian was supposed to do when surrounded by 100 whites with guns. The Indian said
    " give the f up".
    2000 Cherokee listened to Jackson and left for Oklahoma right away.
    I think the Indian in the movie had the right idea.

    By bbjohnson on Jan 18, 2009 at 9:37 pm

  8. This place is such a good site…i really enjoy history

    By me on Feb 19, 2009 at 1:04 am

  9. BLEH!! HISTORY!

    By jhdfjskhfame on Feb 23, 2009 at 9:42 pm

  10. woa. . . . . . luved it!!!

    By michella on Mar 5, 2009 at 1:17 pm

  11. I HATE PRESIDENT JACKSON!!!

    By Nick on Mar 14, 2009 at 12:27 pm

  12. i love andrew jackson i have been too is house it is magnificent!!!!!!!!!!!

    By patrick on Mar 16, 2009 at 9:16 am

  13. i love andrew jackson<3

    By frank on Mar 24, 2009 at 1:13 pm

  14. Great president, but a JERK!!!!!!

    By shamishka on Apr 14, 2009 at 8:39 pm

  15. WOW

    By sbfsdbfbsdf on Apr 29, 2009 at 12:11 pm

  16. last year i got a D in history and this site helped me out!now i have a 90!!!!!!!!!!andrew jackson??????I HAV NO CLUE

    By litterbox on May 5, 2009 at 10:42 am

  17. i had a C in history and the teacher didnt help me at all so thos helped me a hole lot!!

    By yolanda on May 5, 2009 at 10:43 am

  18. This helps. but i hate history.. but i got really good notes on this. woo. haha.

    By Ann. :) on May 20, 2009 at 12:37 pm

  19. i think this is just wrong

    By sharon d on May 28, 2009 at 9:11 am

  20. i have never liked history its just not my thing….but this page was really helpful.
    and who IS Andrew Jackson??

    By cheyenne sanderson(loves ira thompson) on May 28, 2009 at 1:06 pm

  21. boring but informative helped me out on mii project hooray

    By tamzgurl33 on Oct 21, 2009 at 2:28 pm

  22. cool webi site

    By tamzgurl33 on Oct 21, 2009 at 2:29 pm

  23. The phrase "Indian Removal Act" does not exist ANYWHERE IN THIS @#@$# ARTICLE.

    By ballsack lol on Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 am

  24. jaksom was a good prez but had stupid plans

    By jman 123 lol on Mar 4, 2010 at 1:17 pm

  25. jackson was a good president i dont know what yall are talking about

    By blake creel on Mar 8, 2010 at 11:01 am

  26. Andrew Jackson was a racist S.O.B

    By Joe Elton on Mar 10, 2010 at 12:02 pm

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Dec 21, 2008: Prop 8? - Page 43

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these figures from the Old West has the most inflated reputation?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
STAY CONNECTED WITH US 
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
HistoryNet on Twitter HistoryNet RSS Feed

What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Picture of the Day | Daily Quiz | Daily History Question

Copyright © 2010 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Subscription Help