HistoryNet mastheadHistoryNetShop Summer Catalog

America’s Civil War: John Mosby and George Custer Clash in the Shenandoah Valley

America's Civil War  | 2 comments  | Print This Post  | Email This Post

Mosby’s increased harrassment of Northern units brought even harsher Union devastation on Shenandoah farms. A vicious cycle was thus formed in the Valley–Sheridan’s men destroyed homes and farms because Mosby’s guerrillas hampered communications and ambushed isolated Northern units, while Mosby’s forces attacked with increasing ferocity because Sheridan’s men devastated the Shenandoah.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to America's Civil War magazine

Custer’s infamy in the Valley increased when one of his cavalry charges proved to be decisive at the battle of Opequon Creek, resulting in the capture of 700 Confederates. By now Custer was so hated in the Shenandoah that Sheridan warned him against getting captured. ‘If the Rebs should ever lay you by the heels, they’ll string you up directly.’

Custer had to be constantly vigilant, for Mosby’s Rangers seemed to materialize everywhere. They were lightning-fast riders who used two revolvers rather than the unwieldy saber. The North had so much trouble getting supplies and messages to the front that one colonel estimated 500 cavalry would be needed to adequately protect a supply train. Northern cavalrymen so feared Mosby’s Rangers that some said they would rather charge into battle than patrol Valley roads.

The deeper Sheridan moved up the Valley, the more frequent and savage became guerrilla actions. Captain George Sanford of the 1st U.S. Cavalry said everyone was careful because ‘No party of less than 50 men was safe a mile from camp. The loss in men, animals and supplies was enormous. ‘

One of Sheridan’s aides was found in a field with his throat slit. In retaliation Sheridan ordered every house, barn, and outbuilding in a five-mile radius burned. Rations were so low at times that soldiers’ morale decreased. One group of 60 stunned Northern bathers was even captured nude, in the South Branch River while swimming.

Northern troops roundly condemned guerrilla actions as being cowardly and considered Mosby’s men ‘of all created beings most despicable.’ Famous poet Walt Whitman luridly wrote that Mosby’s men ‘would run a knife through the wounded, the aged, the children, without compunction.’

Without moral compunctions themselves, Sheridan’s men went about destroying the Valley. A newspaper correspondent who accompanied them wrote, ‘The atmosphere, from horizon to horizon, has been black with the smoke of a hundred conflagrations, and at night a gleam brighter and more lurid than sunset has shot from every verge…. The completeness of the devastation is awful. Hundreds of nearly starving people are going north…. not half the inhabitants of the Valley can subsist on it in its present condition.’ Confederate soldier Henry Douglas compared what he saw to a holocaust and tried ‘to restrain my bitterness (but) it is an insult to civilization and to God to pretend that the Laws of War justify such warfare.’

Invariably, warfare fought in such a brutal manner will lead to horrific atrocities. That is what happened on September 22, near the town of Front Royal, midway up the Valley. A Northern ambulance train was attacked by a group of Rangers led by Captain Sam Chapman, William’s brother. Chapman’s force quickly realized they were outnumbered, and in an attempt to break out, rode directly at Northern troops.

After the skirmish, the mangled body of Lieutenant Charles McMaster was found in the road, riddled with bullets and trampled by horses. Northern troops swore McMaster was brutally gunned down while trying to surrender. Rangers claimed he was killed in the heat of short, intense battle after his panicky horse rode into their ranks.

Whatever the actual facts, Northern troops were boiling for revenge. Custer was in the same frame, as well, for he had been plagued by Mosby’s constant harrassment long enough. Only the day before, his orderly had been captured while carrying a slaughtered sheep back to camp for Custer’s meal.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Tags: , , ,

HistoryNet.com Subject Locator
  1. 2 Comments to “America’s Civil War: John Mosby and George Custer Clash in the Shenandoah Valley”

  2. The author is incorrect in stating that Sheridan told his soldiers to leave Mosby’s men alone IF THEY DID NOT HARASS UNION TROOPS. That is plain nonsense. Mosby continued to “harass Union troops” with great success until he disbanded his command in April, 1865 after Appomattox.

    Sheridan stopped any further such actions because he knew that Mosby caught far more of his men than he caught of Mosby’s and that the morale of his men – concerned about being captured anyway by Mosby – would suffer badly if they thought that their fate would be the rope or a bullet. Mosby was ready to fight under the black flag if that had been Sheridan’s desire but there can be no doubt that Mosby would have gotten the better of that battle and Sheridan knew it.

    Interestingly enough, Sheridan sent a letter back to Mosby via Russell, the young scout Mosby had sent through the lines. Mosby’s letter to Sheridan is known among other reasons because he sent it to the newspapers so that his position was made as widely known as possible. However, Sheridan’s letter to Mosby has never been uncovered and published – at least to my knowledge. It is interesting to think what Sheridan said and why John Mosby never revealed it.

    By Valerie Protopapas on Jul 16, 2009 at 6:35 pm

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. May 18, 2009: Old Virginia News» Blog Archive » Another reason for Southerners to celebrate the 4th of July

Post a Comment

Please note that HistoryNet Staff cannot respond to requests for research of any type. Please visit our research forum to post research questions. If you have a question about our magazines, please use the contact us form.

Related Articles



SPONSORED SITES







HistoryNet Article Archives Historynet Spacer

OPINION POLL

Which of these World War I aircraft was the best fighter plane?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See previous polls

STAY CONNECTED WITH US

RSS Feed
 
Get Our Daily HistoryNet Email
 
 


What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

 Get our RSS!
 Newsletter Signup

From Our Magazines

Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Great History | Achtung Panzer!

Terms of Use | Copyright © 2009 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Contact Us|Advertise With Us|Subscription Help