<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American History Interviews Psychologist Jonathan Haidt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/american-history-interviews-psychologist-jonathan-haidt.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/american-history-interviews-psychologist-jonathan-haidt.htm</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 05:23:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Timmermans</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/american-history-interviews-psychologist-jonathan-haidt.htm#comment-822753</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Timmermans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13686291#comment-822753</guid>
		<description>Russ, I couldn&#039;t agree more. This was a very strange article. I&#039;m not sure why it was even in a history magazine. This article had NOTHING to do with psychology as a science. It appears as though this article was just more blatant propaganda for being a conservative Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, I couldn&#039;t agree more. This was a very strange article. I&#039;m not sure why it was even in a history magazine. This article had NOTHING to do with psychology as a science. It appears as though this article was just more blatant propaganda for being a conservative Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Woody</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/american-history-interviews-psychologist-jonathan-haidt.htm#comment-816374</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13686291#comment-816374</guid>
		<description>Haidt professes to be a &quot;liberal.&quot;  Yet he freely uses right wing terms like &quot;nanny state&quot; (for when the government helps those in need).  He should at least have the courage, or maybe the moral conviction, of presenting himself as a conservative.  He is as blind as the people he&#039;s claiming to explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haidt professes to be a &#034;liberal.&#034;  Yet he freely uses right wing terms like &#034;nanny state&#034; (for when the government helps those in need).  He should at least have the courage, or maybe the moral conviction, of presenting himself as a conservative.  He is as blind as the people he&#039;s claiming to explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
