Historynet/feed historynet feedback facebook link Weider History Group RSS feed Weider Subscriptions Historynet Home page

American History: Harry Truman and the 1948 U.S. Presidential Election

Published Online: June 12, 2006 
Print Friendly
11 comments FONT +  FONT -

Few people believed that President Harry S. Truman had a chance of winning the 1948 presidential election. The three great national polling organizations all predicted that Governor Thomas E. Dewey of New York, his Republican opponent, would win by a wide margin. The press was equally certain of a Dewey victory, for the odds against the incumbent seemed insurmountable. Truman's own party had split, with Democrat Strom Thurmond running in the South as a 'Dixiecrat' and former vice president Henry Wallace running as the candidate of the newly formed Progressive Party. It was expected that Wallace would drain vitally needed liberal votes away from the president. Among Democratic politicians and his own campaign staff, it seemed that the only person who thought Truman could win was the candidate himself.

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to American History magazine

Of course, there were many who wondered how Harry Truman had ever made it into the White House in the first place. The son of a Missouri mule-trader-turned-farmer, Truman differed markedly from his predecessor, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Truman, who had served as a captain of artillery in World War I, was a failed businessman whose haberdashery in Kansas City had closed during a recession in 1922. While overseas, however, Truman had met Jim Pendergast, whose family was a Democratic political dynasty in Kansas City. With the support of less-than-reputable political boss Tom Pendergast, Truman was elected eastern judge of Jackson County and then, in 1934, United States Senator. Though Truman himself was a person of impeccable personal honesty and political integrity, many in Washington looked down on him as 'the Senator from Pendergast.' Only during his second term in the Senate, when he headed a committee investigating the national defense program, did he gain a reputation for hard work and diligence and the respect of his fellow senators.

In 1944, Franklin Roosevelt picked Truman as his running mate to replace Vice President Henry Wallace, whose extreme liberal views were far out of alignment which those of Democratic party leaders. When Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945, Truman became president. It was not a job he had ever aspired to, and he confided to his diary and in letters to his family his doubts about his abilities.

By 1948, however, Harry Truman had grown with the job and was determined to seek a full term in his own right. He also sought vindication for the rebuff his party had suffered at the polls in the 1946 congressional elections, when the Republicans gained an overwhelming majority in both the House and the Senate.

The Republicans had selected Truman's opponent, Thomas Dewey, in June on the third ballot at their convention at Philadelphia's Convention Hall. For his running mate, Dewey picked California governor Earl Warren. Roosevelt had defeated Dewey in 1944, but Truman's hopes looked slim. 'Barring a political miracle, it was the kind of ticket that could not fail to sweep the Republican Party back into power,' Time magazine proclaimed.

The Democratic convention opened on July 12 in the same Philadelphia hall the Republicans had used, but the mood in the building had darkened. The decorative flags and bunting had not been changed and now looked bedraggled and shop-worn. The Associated Press noted that 'The Democrats act as though they have accepted an invitation to a funeral.' Until a few days before the convention there had been an active movement to deny the nomination to Truman. A diverse group of party leaders, headed by James Roosevelt, son of the former president, had pushed hard for General Dwight Eisenhower. The Eisenhower boom ended only when the general stated unequivocally that he would not accept the nomination if it was offered.

The Democrats were further fractured when a coalition of liberals led by Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota inserted a strong civil rights plank, modeled after Truman's own proposals to Congress, in the platform. Delegates from the conservative South, intent on maintaining segregation there, were adamantly opposed to the plank. Before the nominating process even began, Alabama's Handy Ellis announced that his state's presidential electors were 'never to cast a vote for Harry Truman, and never to cast their vote for any candidate with a civil rights program such as adopted by the convention.' Half of the Alabama delegation and the entire Mississippi contingent walked out. Two days later, disaffected southern Democrats met in Birmingham, Alabama, to nominate Governor Strom Thurmond of South Carolina for president. The new party officially called itself the States' Rights Democrats; the press dubbed them 'Dixiecrats,' and the name stuck. The 'Solid South'–a traditional Democratic stronghold–seemed lost to Truman. Meanwhile, on July 27, the Progressive Party nominated Henry Wallace for president.

Truman, who picked Senator Alben Barkley of Kentucky as his running mate, was undeterred by the defections from his party. For his convention acceptance speech, the president used only an outline written in short, punchy sentences. He electrified the audience when he said, 'Senator Barkley and I will win this election and make the Republicans like it–don't you forget it.' It was the first time during the convention that anyone had spoken of actually winning. Truman then praised the higher wages, higher farm income, and greater benefits for Americans he claimed as Democratic accomplishments, and went on to condemn the Republican Congress. He spoke with scorn of the recently adopted Republican platform, contrasting the programs it contained with congressional inaction on similar programs he had proposed.

Truman roused the convention to a standing ovation when he announced his intention to call Congress back into special session to 'ask them to pass the laws to halt rising prices, to meet the housing crisis–which they say they are for in their platform.' When this special session did convene it accomplished little, as Truman expected, but it gave the president a campaign issue. The country's woes, he asserted, were the result of the 'do-nothing' Republican Congress.


This article was written by Michael D. Haydock and originally published in the December 2000 issue of American History Magazine. For more great articles, subscribe to American History magazine today!


11 Responses to “American History: Harry Truman and the 1948 U.S. Presidential Election”


  1. 1
  2. 2
    Paul Spengler says:

    Truman pulled off his upset partly because the Republicans were complacent in 1948, which they will not be in 2012. Truman also won because the memories of the Great Depression were still very fresh in people's minds in 1948 and people felt the Democratic Party had saved them from the Depression. Truman looked like a common man and could speak like a common man. He could express real indignation. In 2012, people blame both parties for their country's economic problems. Obama doesn't look like or talk like the average voter, nor can he express real indignation. People see him as professorial, like Woodrow Wilson or Adlai Stevenson, not as a tribuen of the common man, like Harry Truman. Truman could blame the GOP's 80th Congress for not doing enough. Today, people are afraid the government will do too much.

    • 2.1
      MTB says:

      Practically all of the journalistic history telling of the '48 election of late has been for the obvious reason to draw hope-filled parallels between Truman and Obama's reelection campaign. Thank you, Mr. Spengler, for being one of the few to point out a most important factor in that election– that Mr. Dewey was largely responsible for his own defeat. I look forward to the 2012 election, if for no other reason than we will be able to put the 1948 election back into moth balls where it belongs with others of the unimportant elections in our nation's history.

  3. 3
    IMOO says:

    Insightful argument, however it leaves out one HUGELY important fact. While Eisenhower refused the nomination, due to the fact that he was too honorable and loyal to Truman, he stumped for Truman pretty consistently during the campaign. Having the man who "won WW-II" on his side, was a huge factor in Truman's re-election. Obama has no such supporter.

  4. 4
    McGovern72 says:

    The Obama Optics are nothing like what Truman faced in '48. for example:
    - Obamacare melts down in 2012, Supremes 'dance it out of existence'
    - Solyndra and the solar industry job creation machine is exposed as a 'money pit' like no other in history – study that fact Mr Spengler!
    - Fast and Foolish shows us just how incompent the WH really is in dealing with a BIG F Deal ;-)
    ……and, WH staff email show that they went to 'yahoo.mail' to keep their conversations off the books! surprised?
    - Joey 'the Mouth' Biden on the ticket – can you imagine him in any debates with the GOP VP candidate? priceless!
    - 'Can't Wait' Mr Obama? how about 'STILL WAITING' for a budget from you OR the SENATE Dems!

    Mr Spengler, when this is all down in early November 2012 – I look forward to a follow up story from you – on how Obama was Carter-esque in his campaign ;-)

  5. 5
    Bill Clinton says:

    I know of such a man.

    His wife ran for president a few years back…

  6. 6
    Mark says:

    Robert Kennedy said that "Six months is an eternity in politics." Nobody yet knows what will happen in November 2012. What is known is that the economy is down now, people like Obama personally even if they doubt his ability to lead out of the mess and the Republicans have an exceptionally weak field of candidates and seem to be reaching for the weaker ones.
    But nobody knew even a few days before election day that 1) Truman would win in 1948 or that 2) Ronald Reagan would win a big landslide against Jimmy Carter in 1980. We're still a year away.

  7. 7
    Jerry M. says:

    George Soros and Bill Gates are Maobama's Eisenhower, willing to give him as much cash as he thinks he needs to weasel his way back into office for another 4 years of catastrophic destructive hope and change! Won't work-he's shrimp-fried toast! Plan your summit in Plains with Jimmah-NOW!

  8. 8
    IronKnuckle says:

    I might suggest a parallel to Hillary Clinton's win over Barack Obama in the 2008 New Hampshire primary. Absolutely everyone expected Obama to win the NH primary; every poll said Obama was up.

    Which can have the effect of maximizing turnout of the "losing" party's base as well as making front-runner-loyalists think hard about whether they're solidly behind their candidate.

  9. 9
    valleyforge says:

    This article doesn't even give a nod to the economic situation in 1948, which at the time of original publication in 2000 was believed to have been sluggish at best, hence the poor outlook most contemporaries gave Truman reelection chances. But recent revisions show that the economy was growing at a 6.4% clip for most of 1948, which under almost any political economy model would have the incumbent winning in a landslide. Consider that Gallup and others didn't poll in the few months leading up to the election and you have a case of a completely predictable result being seen as extraordinary by contemporaries who didn't have the data to measure it or put it in context.

  10. 10

    [...] the real appearance of outsider candidates that could put the 2012 race into a 1912 Bull Moose or 1948 Strom-Dixiecrat – Wallace-Progressive Party free-for-all territory.Rocky Anderson is [...]



Related Articles


History Net Images Spacer
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
History Net Daily Activities
History net Spacer
History net Spacer
Historynet Spacer
HISTORYNET READERS' POLL

Which of these nonfiction books had the most significant effect on American society?

View Results | See previous polls

Loading ... Loading ...
History net Spacer History net Spacer
STAY CONNECTED WITH US
RSS Feed Daily Email Update
History net Spacer

What is HistoryNet?

The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 5,000 articles originally published in our various magazines.

If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest.

From Our Magazines
Weider History Group

Weider History Network:  HistoryNet | Armchair General | Achtung Panzer!
Today in History | Picture of the Day | Daily History Quiz | History Forums

Copyright © 2012 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Advertise With Us | Subscription Help | Privacy Policy