<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambush and Siege at Paint Rock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historynet.com/ambush-and-siege-at-paint-rock.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historynet.com/ambush-and-siege-at-paint-rock.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ambush-and-siege-at-paint-rock</link>
	<description>From the World&#039;s Largest History Magazine Publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dewey Tsonetokoy Sr</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/ambush-and-siege-at-paint-rock.htm#comment-218493</link>
		<dc:creator>Dewey Tsonetokoy Sr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681951#comment-218493</guid>
		<description>Was in that vacinity in 2004, 05, &amp; 07 and met the Campbells, a delightful elderly Texas couple who own the property on which the site Paint Rock is located. That&#039;s the bright side. 

The darkside is, people want to revise history for the sake of tourism dollars. The story is just another historical fallacy promoted and perpetuated by writers of Texas and Native American history. This is due to the romantism that Texas has with the Comanche. The Comanche certainly did not have any cultural or historic ties to the sacred images at Paint Rock. 

(You have been abushed by a Kiowa.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was in that vacinity in 2004, 05, &amp; 07 and met the Campbells, a delightful elderly Texas couple who own the property on which the site Paint Rock is located. That&#039;s the bright side. </p>
<p>The darkside is, people want to revise history for the sake of tourism dollars. The story is just another historical fallacy promoted and perpetuated by writers of Texas and Native American history. This is due to the romantism that Texas has with the Comanche. The Comanche certainly did not have any cultural or historic ties to the sacred images at Paint Rock. </p>
<p>(You have been abushed by a Kiowa.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Hadeler</title>
		<link>http://www.historynet.com/ambush-and-siege-at-paint-rock.htm#comment-191816</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Hadeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historynet.com/?p=13681951#comment-191816</guid>
		<description>The story of Ambush and Siege at Paint Rock is greatly disputed by historians and probably did not take place.  No contemporary evidence of this action has been found to date and substantial circumstantial evidence suggests the fight never occurred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story of Ambush and Siege at Paint Rock is greatly disputed by historians and probably did not take place.  No contemporary evidence of this action has been found to date and substantial circumstantial evidence suggests the fight never occurred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

