| |

African American 92nd Infantry Division Fought in Italy During World War II
|
World War II |
On Christmas Eve the Fifth Army called off its Christmas Day assault, but the Buffalo Soldiers, who were deployed on both sides of the Serchio River, continued to advance, facing German mortar and artillery rounds as they moved through more of northern Italy’s mountain towns. The 366th’s 2nd Battalion held the town of Barga on the American right flank, while the 370th held Gallicano, west of the Serchio River. On Christmas Eve, the 370th sent its 2nd Battalion east of the river into the little village of Sommocolonia, the northernmost edge of the American line. Light artillery and mortar rounds hit Sommocolonia but there seemed to be little enemy activity, so most of the 2nd Battalion moved out for duty elsewhere, leaving behind only two platoons. On the extreme right, just east of Sommocolonia, lay the villages of Bebbio and Scarpello, occupied by two platoons of the 92nd Division Reconnaissance Troop. Before sunrise on the day after Christmas, the Germans attacked the villages just north and east of Gallicano. Although the primary German assault seemed to come from west of the river, toward Gallicano, partisans were also battling enemy soldiers north of Sommocolonia later in the morning. Within two hours, Sommocolonia and the two American platoons there were surrounded. A third platoon moved up to reinforce the embattled Sommocolonia troops. Lieutenant John Fox, an artillery forward observer for the 366th, exemplified the impressive fighting spirit of the black soldiers. When enemy troops surrounded the lieutenant’s position inside a house and were about to overrun him, he ordered artillery fire directly on his own position, sacrificing his life. Fox’s heroic action bought valuable time that helped save other troops, and he was posthumously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. The two platoons of the 370th, along with a group of partisans, engaged in house-to-house fighting with the enemy during that battle. Many of the Germans were dressed as partisans, making the situation even more confusing and dangerous. Just before noon, the platoons were ordered to evacuate the village, but they were trapped. They managed to hold out until nightfall, but of the 70 Americans involved, only one officer and 17 men managed to fight their way out of the village that night as ordered. Meanwhile, the two reconnaissance platoons at Bebbio and Scarpello were overrun by enemy troops and ordered to fall back. Despite heavy fighting, they managed to withdraw to their command post at Coreglia. German artillery fire began to cut deeper into American lines, and the 370th ordered its troops to quit Gallicano and secure the high ground nearby. With the Allied port of Leghorn threatened, the Fifth Army called back the 1st Armored Division from II Corps control, and the 8th Indian Division, a British unit, moved to the area as reinforcements. On December 27, American fighter-bombers roared into the valley and hammered Sommocolonia, Gallicano and other front-line areas. By January 1, the Allies had more or less re-established their original positions. With the Germans less of an imminent threat, the 8th Indian Division pulled out, leaving the valley to the Buffalo Soldiers. The Fifth Army postponed its major offensive until April, but General Almond decided that his division would launch its own attack in February. Almond devised his operation not as a breakthrough assault but as a division-strength ‘feeler movement’ intended to determine enemy strength and deployment, draw more enemy troops to the area and enhance the division’s own positions. Troops in the Serchio Valley were to seize the Lama di Sotto Ridge, overlooking the German supply center at Castelnuovo di Garfagnana, and create a diversion while the main assault concentrated on the coastal sector. Almond hoped to reach the Strettoia hill mass on the coast, just north of the Cinquale Canal, and then take Massa. Once in Massa, American artillery would come within firing range of La Spezia. Units were moved around again so that the 370th and 371st occupied the Coastal Sector while the 365th went to the Serchio Valley. The 366th was divided between both areas. On February 4, the 366th held Gallicano, and the next day it pushed its lines into the outlying villages. The 365th, to the east of the Serchio River, took the town of Lama, just north of Sommocolonia, and occupied Mount Della Stella at the foot of the Lama di Sotto Ridge. The 365th held out against numerous counterattacks until February 8, when a full battalion of Germans pushed the Americans off the hill and out of Lama. At nightfall on the 10th, after encountering grueling enemy artillery fire and grenadier counterattacks, the Buffalo Soldiers retook Lama. Pages: 1 2 3 4Tags: 20th - 21st Century, African American History, Historical Conflicts, World War II
|
SPONSORED SITES
STAY CONNECTED WITH US |
|
|
||
What is HistoryNet?The HistoryNet.com is brought to you by the Weider History Group, the world's largest publisher of history magazines. HistoryNet.com contains daily features, photo galleries and over 1,200 articles originally published in our various magazines. If you are interested in a specific history subject, try searching our archives, you are bound to find something to pique your interest. |
From Our Magazines
|
Weider History Group |
Weider History Network: HistoryNet | Armchair General | Once A Marine | Achtung Panzer! Terms of Use | Copyright © 2008 Weider History Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. |
||
13 Comments to “African American 92nd Infantry Division Fought in Italy During World War II”
There is public confusion over the separate 24th Infantry regiment and the use of the term “Buffalo Soldiers. (Now holding a local reunion), and the 92nd Infantry Division that fought couragiously in Italy. I served on TDY with the 92nd a short time before they left Louisiana.
By Harold Borchert on Jul 10, 2008 at 8:24 am
I served for a short time on TDY with the 92nd Inf. Division in Louisiana. The separate 24th Inf. Regiment, (now in reunion locally) uses the same name, “Buffalo Soldiers.” The term, and the units should be more clearly defined.
By Harold Borchert on Jul 10, 2008 at 8:28 am
I served on TDY with the 92nd as they performed P.O.M.(preparation overseas movement) in Louisiana, prior to going to Italy. There seems to be some public confusion over the term “Buffalo Soldier” as used by the separate 24th Inf. Regiment (now in reunion locally…). For the history, some clarification seems necessary.
By Harold Borchert on Jul 10, 2008 at 8:51 am
There are two distinct uses of the phrase “Buffalo Soldier.” The historic usage refers to the four historic African-American units in the Army, 1867-1954, the 9th and 10 Cavalry and the 24th and 25th Infantry and their short-lived 1865-1867 predecessors. Now many African-American soldiers, especially older veterans, refer to themselves as “Buffalo Soldiers” simply meaning they are continuing the brave tradition of African-American service in the Army. Personally, I think the second current common usage is confusing. I have talked to veterans of the four historic regiments, and in their discussions they used the term only to apply to members of the four regiments. But the current usage is popular and will continue for some time. I hope this helps.
By Martin Gordon on Jul 17, 2008 at 2:39 pm
I hope more facts come up pertaining to the 92 Infantry Division during ww2. It is amazing that some negate the influence of Black Soldiers during the war.
By will on Sep 18, 2008 at 2:28 pm
I was wondering if my grandfather by the name of Andrew Giles Kingston Bowman was part of the Buffalo Soldier’s during WW II or what part did he have during his military career.
By Andrew Woodson on Sep 23, 2008 at 4:09 pm
I served with the 1/10 Cav in Iraq and their unit crest is a buffalo with the ledgend “Ready and Forward”. The 10th is one of the original four regiments, two cavalry and two infantry that were flagged in the late 1860’s and fought in all wars thereafter. I appriciate that the 92nd ID used a buffalo on it’s patch and that the soldiers referred to themselves as “Buffalo Soldiers”, but the term is historically attached to the 10th and the other three regiments ( 9th Cav, 24 and 25 Inf).
By tmccue on Sep 24, 2008 at 10:25 pm
My father tells me that my uncle Stanford “Dwight” Scott was a member of the 92nd division. He went on the earn 2 college degrees and was a city planner for the city of Chicago. Thank him for the lake front view you now enjoy.
By V on Sep 28, 2008 at 11:39 am
My Grandfather’s daddy had been in the 24th Infantry during the years 1888-1891, at Fort Hauchuca and although my Grandpa was in Patton’s Army during WW2 and clearly continuing a tradition, he only referred to his father as the “Buffalo Soldier” in the family.
By William T. Sutphin, IV on Sep 29, 2008 at 12:31 am
Looking for anyone who served with my father Ben Lawrence Payne WWII Italy. I was adopted and never knew him; only that he was a Trench Rat in Italy. I have his hand book and fez
By Letitia on Sep 30, 2008 at 4:53 pm
HistoryNet staff cannot respond here. Please read disclaimer just above this text box before posting.
My Great Uncle Charlie Wycoff - Sgt Wycoff, served with the 92nd Buffalo 371st Division at Ft Huachuca, AZ and then in Europe during WW11. I have large photo of the 92nd showing approx 125 soldiers circa 1942 43
By Rodney Grimes on Oct 13, 2008 at 11:20 pm